Anna Maria Polo (63), lawyer and host of the highly successful Telemundo cycle “Case Closed”, has become very popular. The historical lawyer and his strong character are a sensation, as well as the cases that are talked about in every show. From the unusual nature of some of the cases, she had to settle the fury created by certain demands from her litigants, and Dr. Polo did not care to hide.
Further, Anna Maria Polo He is a true influencer on social networks and his posts on his personal life, his family and tips for carrying out his daily routine get endless interactions on his Instagram account. But the driver’s most unique feature “Case Closed” In each case the particular way in which it mediates – or attempts to mediate. Although she always imposes her personality and makes herself respectable, at one point the emotion gets so strong that the Doctor breaks down in tears during a performance.
The day when Dr. Polo broke down in tears saying “Case Closed”.
Conflicts and situations Anna Maria Polo Had to settle for years “Case Closed” They were very different. Some of them are incredible, others are bad and outrageous. But in one case, the situation was very sad and emotional. And the doctor could not hold back tears of emotion and pain.
In the episode in question, a man – who was pregnant – claimed that his wife had lost their children twice, creating indescribable pain for the couple and their elder daughter, who happens to be her little brother. Faced with this situation, a psychologist suggested they adopt a dog. The family did so, but an unexpected twist in the whole situation led them to be on the witness stand. “Case Closed” and ahead Anna Maria Polo.
The plaintiff in that episode is a woman who claims to be the owner of the puppy, whom she has lost and is desperately searching for. At one beach they all find the little animal with his new family at the same time. Because of this, the woman asked the doctor But like Inside “Case Closed” Get your pet back. The moving nature of the whole situation, and the difficulty of making a judgment that did not prejudice either party—for each had his reasons—brought the driver to tears.
