Controversial decision of the Argentine referee Nestor Pithana In the construction goal Brazil Against Colombia On top of that USA Cup Led by distracted soldiers Reynolds Ruda, In a situation that was the talk of the press.
Argentine newspapers mentioned the issue. Newspaper Ole To mark the controversial move, the judge put it on its cover and shouted, ‘Pitanaso!’
Cover photo of ‘Ole’ newspaper from Argentina.
You may be interested in: (Listen to VAR audios about Brazil’s controversial goal game)
The Brazilian press only noted the return of the Titans, who went 0-1 and won 2-1.
“Brazil’s goals are two different situations. In one, I think the referee’s decision distracted our players, and then there’s less focus on kicking that corner, they expected us,” coach Ruda said.
“Undoubtedly all the efforts of the team have gone into a stalled ball situation, which has already been discussed, analyzed and it will be difficult for us to finally give a try of a better game,” he added.
தேசம், Argentina refers to conversations between the judge and those involved in the analysis of the VAR.
‘La Nazien’ and controversial play from Argentina.
Y Bogan, A native of Peru, issued a protest of the Colombian Football Association.
‘El Bogan’ and controversial play from Peru.
Country, From Uruguay, He also mentioned this in his digital version.
The action of ‘El Boss’ and Judge Nastor Pitana from Uruguay.
